Archive for December 2007

Now the Police are missing out

English police are on the receiving end of the same racist treatment as English nurses when it comes to pay increases.

Earlier this year, our nurses were told that they would be getting the same percentage pay rise as Scottish nurses but rather than a single pay increase like in Scotland, their pay increase was to be staged meaning they were getting less.  English police officers have now fallen foul of the same discriminatory policy – they are to reveive the same 2.5% pay rise as Scottish officers but it won’t come into effect until January whilst in Scotland the pay rise is immediate, in full and backdated to September when the British government and the Police entered arbitration over the pay deal.

The emergency services are being treated like pawns in this game of robbing from the English to pay for the Scots.  This isn’t a game, peoples’ lives are at risk if nurses and police officers decide that they don’t want to do their job any more because of this racist, discriminatory decision.

Racial discrimination against the English: just another service New Liebour provide.

Technorati Technorati Tags: , ,

AWM appoint new Chief Executive

The unelected Regional Development Agency, Advantage West Midlands, has appointed its Deputy Chief Executive, Mick Laverty, as its new Chief Executive.

The current Chief Executive, John Edwards, is taking early retirement (although AWM’s PR company seems to think he’s not) in March next year.

Laverty will take over an unelected quango with 300 staff, a £300m annual budget and a £160,000 basic salary with £32,000 in performance-related bonuses paid for by the taxpayer.

Technorati Technorati Tags: ,

Ministry of Truth unveils further attempt to deprive us of our liberty

Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary, has pronounced that the state should be allowed to detain “terrorism” suspects without charge for 42 days.  The 28 day limit that we currently have is already longer than any other developed nation.  The British government has already admitted that there have been no occasions when the current 28 day limit has not been sufficient.

I sent the following email to my Liebour MP, David Wright, this morning:

Dear David,

I see that your government is due to announce its plans for increasing the unlawful and unconstitutional detention without charge of “terrorist” suspects.

The “anti-terrorism” laws that your government brought in have been abused systematically and have failed to catch a single terrorist.

Walter Wolfgang was physically removed from the Labour Party Conference and refused re-entry under the Terrorism Act

A woman and man were arrested and detained under the Terrorism Act for reading out the names of dead soldiers near Downing Street

A man was arrested and detained under the Terrorism Act for carrying a blank placard outside Parliament

Several people have been put under house arrest after being found innocent in a court of law under the Terrorism Act

As of last year, 300,000 people were stopped and searched under the Terrorism Act but not one of them was a terrorist
Those are just a few examples of the abuse of the Terrorism Act and the illegal and unconstitutional curtailment of civil liberties in the name of “anti-terrorism”.

Your Prime Minister says that it’s necessary for your government to curtail my rights and liberties so that terrorists can’t change my way of life,  Well guess what – my way of life has been changed for the worse because of your government’s “anti-terror” legislation.

I urge you strongly not to support this illegal and unconstitutional attempt to advance the police state.

Stuart

The British government has previously tried to increase the limit to 90 days but this was beaten down to 28 days.  Protest is effectively illegal outside the British Parliament now so the only way to stop this illiberal move is to convince enough MPs as possible to oppose it.

Technorati Technorati Tags: ,

Scottish Liebour wants devolution review

Wendy Alexander, the disgraced Scottish Liebour leader who took an illegal donation for a Jersey businessman, has gained the support of the Scottish Conswervatives and Scottish Illiberal Dumbasscrats for a devolution review funded by the Scottish Parliament.

Alexander will be calling for a review today into devolution in general and how the Scottish Parliament’s financial accountability can be strengthened.

It’s not clear whether this is the usual Liebour tactic of getting caught doing something wrong and passing more laws to stop it happening rather than keeping their own house in order, or whether it is a genuine desire to improve the way the Scottish Parliament works and make sure that all those lovely billions they get in subsidies from the English taxpayer are spent properly and not spent on Iron Bru, whiskey and battered mars bars.

On a related note, the illegal donations that Liebour received and No Mandate Brown promised to refund will most likely end up being confiscated and paid into the Treasury instead.  I guess that even Gordon the Goblin King couldn’t get away with forcing UKIP to forfeit the unlawful donation they mistakenly accepted whilst refunding what they knew was an illegal donation to the donor.

Technorati Technorati Tags: , , , ,

This has got to be a joke, surely?

A review of prisons is to recommend that sentencing is linked to the availability of prison places.

Lord Phillips, the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, has called for more fine and community rehabilitation instead of prison sentences.

Setting aside the fact that simmary justice is illegal and that a massive percentage of court fines either go unpaid or are paid back by token amounts (ie. £1 a week, fiver a month, etc.), the reason why most crimes are committed can be boiled down to two things:

1. The criminal justice system no longer punishes criminals
2. Having a criminal record is socially acceptable

Both of these can be solved very easily by the British government.  Punishing people for committing crimes instead of concentrating on excusing their behaviour and rehabilitating them will discourage budding jailbirds from committing crimes and concentrating on punishment instead of “community rehabilitation” will make criminality less acceptable.  It’s not ok to break the law, it’s not ok to criminal record and it’s not ok to have been in prison – the British government needs to stop telling people that it is.

Technorati Technorati Tags: ,

EDM 266

Just sent this to my MP … 

Dear David,

Your Prime Minister signed the Scottish Claim of Right in which he pledged that the interests of Scottish people would be paramount in all his acts and deliberations.

Now that he is your British Prime Minister, the interests of all people in “Britain” should be paramount in all his acts and deliberations.

Asymmetric devolution, the continued existence of the Barnett Formula, persisting in allowing MPs elected in Scotland to vote on areas of legislation that have been devolved in their own constituencies, a commitment to the abolition of England by regionalisation, refusing to acknowledge that English people have a “sovereign right to determine the best form of government for themselves” (something else that was in the Scottish Claim of Right) – all these demonstrate Gordon Brown’s continued adherence to the principles of the Scottish Claim of Right.

Gordon Brown’s faux-Britishness is a sham.  He has pledged to put the interests of 5m people first and foremost in everything he does to the detriment of the other 55m and is standing by that pledge.  EDM266 calls on your Prime Minister to renounce the Scottish Claim of Right as it is clearly incompatible with his position as British Prime Minister.  The text is as follows:

That this House recognises that the Prime Minister is a signatory to the Scottish Claim of Right in which he declared and pledged that in all his actions and deliberations the interests of the Scottish people `shall be paramount’; believes that by declaring that the interests of the Scottish people should come first he has committed himself to discriminating against the people of England, Wales and Northern Ireland; considers this to be incompatible with being the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in which office the interests of all UK people should be equal; and calls on him publicly to disassociate himself from and withdraw from the Scottish Claim of Right.

As an MP elected in England elected to represent the interests of your constituents rather than your party, I would like you to sign EDM266 and reflect what I believe will be the majority view of your constituents; that Gordon Brown’s pledge to put Scottish interests first and foremost in all his acts and deliberations is incompatible with his job as British Prime Minister and discriminatory against the other 55m people of the UK that he has pledged to treat as less important, second-class citizens.

Stuart

p.s. Once again, I ask that you conserve resources, save money and do your bit for the environment by replying to me by email and not by post.

EDM266 can be found here.

Technorati Technorati Tags: , ,

Note to Orange: don’t get involved in a pissing contest with wonko

As previously blogged, I upgraded my phones with Orange a few weeks ago.

I got an excellent deal – phones I wasn’t actually entitled to 3 months before the end of my contract.  So good was the deal, in fact, that when Mrs Sane’s phone eventually came into stock they tried to get out of sending it to me.

Anyway, when the direct debit came out, I found that they had put a £25+VAT upgrade fee on my account by mistake.  Mistakes happen so I phoned them and told them and they said they’d refund the charge back into my account.  Then they said they weren’t, it was down to their upgrade department.  Nobody phoned me back so I phoned them today …

“You put an upgrade fee on my account by mistake and I want it refunded”

It’s been credited to your account and will come off your next bill

“Ok, but I want it refunded so I can use it to buy Christmas presents”

It can’t be refunded, it’s been credited to your account

“Well my next bill isn’t due to be created for another couple of weeks so just take the credit off and refund it instead”

It can’t be refunded, it’s been credited to your account

“Well it’s my money, you took money out of my bank that you weren’t entitled to and I want it back”

I’ll speak to my supervisor

… tum de dum …

Sorry sir, it can’t be refunded

“There’s nothing technically stopping you refunding it though”

Technically there isn’t no

“So it’s not that you can’t refund it, you don’t want to refund it?”

Well … yeah

“In that case, the Direct Debit Guarantee says I’m entitled to a full and immediate refund if you make a mistake so either give me back what you owe me or I’ll phone my bank and take it all back and then you will have to wait until next month for your money”

I can’t refund it

“No problem, I’ll phone my bank then”

So I phoned NatWest, told them what had happened and that I wanted my money back.  They filled out the paperwork while I was on the phone and said the money should be in my account tomorrow.

The moral of the story is: don’t get into a pissing contest with someone like me.

Edit:
The money is back in my account.

Technorati Technorati Tags: , ,

It’s the ENGLISH team

Inspired by Alfie, I put pen finger to paper keyboard once again and asked the RFU to stop playing God Save the Queen before England matches.

Hi,

Our glorious leader has pronounced that deciding which national anthem to play before sporting events is not a matter for the British government and is, instead, the responsibility of the governing body of the sport in question.

Bearing this in mind, can I ask that you please refrain from playing the BRITISH national anthem before ENGLISH rugby matches?

I’m sure that God Save the Queen is very popular amongst the blazer wearing VIP’s in the hospitality lounge but they are only a small group of people.  I think that if you asked the question – perhaps by canvassing the England supporters club – whether fans would rather hear the British national anthem when England play or whether they would rather have an English song such as Jerusalem, they would choose the latter.

Personally, I can’t bring myself to listen to the British national anthem when England is playing and either mute the television or change the channel whilst it is being played.

I’ve written before about the British anthem being played before English games and was given the excuse that Princess Anne is the patron of the RFU.  If you were planning to use that as an excuse again, can you please tell me what Princess Anne thinks about playing an English anthem before an English game?

Regards,

Stuart Parr

If you’re interested in an anthem for England, take a look at the Anthem for England website.

Technorati Technorati Tags: , ,

Teddy Bear Teacher Released

The English teacher who was banged up by jihadi’s in Sudan for allowing her pupils to call a teddy bear Mohammed has been released.

The Sudanese president yesterday granted her a presidential pardon and she was released just after lunch time.

She arrived back in England today.

Technorati Technorati Tags: , , ,

All men are equal in the eyes of the law

The law is the law and all men are equal in the eyes of the law.  This is one of the most fundamental concepts in English law but the most serious of crimes – treason – is committed regularly and goes unpunished.  Other fundamental rights that we have had for centuries and are guaranteed by the constitution are ignored.

Federal Europe 

Membership of the EU is not only damaging to the economy and bad for democracy but is illegal.

Firstly, the 37th article of the 1563 Articles of Religion says that “The Queen’s Majesty hath the chief power in this realm of England and other her dominions, unto whom the chief government of all estates of this realm, whether they be ecclesiastical or civil, in all causes doth appertain, and is not nor ought to be subject to any foreign jurisdiction”.

Secondly, the 1689 Bill of Rights says “And I do declare That noe Forreigne Prince Person Prelate, State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction Power Superiority Preeminence or Authoritie Ecclesiastical or Spirituall within this Realme Soe helpe me God”.  The important bit isn’t the term “forreigne prince” (although the President of France also takes the title of Prince of Andorra when taking office) – it is the word “potentate”.  A potentate is an ambassador performing negotiations on behalf of a large group.  A foreign prince is merely a person holding a royal title in another country who the monarch allows to use that title in this country.

Catholics on the Throne

Last month, the Catholic Bishop of Motherwell, Joseph Devine, criticised No Mandate Brown for failing to support calls for the Act of Settlement to be amended to allow Catholics to become King or Queen.  Attempting to change the line of succession is High Treason under the 1702 Treason Act and the penalty is life in prison.

Abolition of the Monarchy

There exists a Campaign for an Elected Head of State which seeks to remove the Queen as head of state and replace her with a president.  Anyone connected with the campaign or supporting their aims is guilty of treason under the 1848 Treason Felony Act.  The Campaign for an Elected Head of State claims, in its FAQs, that because the House of Lords declared the 1848 Treason Felony Act incompatible with the Human Rights Act that it is no longer against the law.  The ruling was actually a statement by Lord Scott and doesn’t change the law.  Lord Scott said that “in a mature democracy people do not get prosecuted for advocating political change by peaceful and constitutional means”.  Lord Goldsmith, the Attorney General, said that the Treason Felony Act did not breach the right to freedom of expression and refused permission for the Guardian to appeal against the ruling that they had committed treason.  The law, as it stands, holds republicanism as felony treason and punishable by life in prison.

Fighting for a foreign power

When Afghanistan and Iraq were invaded, the military found several men who hold British passports fighting against our troops.  Again, this is high treason by giving aid to the enemy.  However, rather than being tried for treason, they were packed off to Guantanamo Bay or brought back here and tried for terrorism-related charges.

Summary Justice

The 1689 Bill of Rights says “That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction are illegal and void”.  Summary justice – parking tickets, speeding tickets, on-the-spot fines for drunken behaviour or dropping litter, etc. – is illegal and any fines are void.  The Bill of Rights is a constitutional law and is not assumed to be repealed if another law is passed that contradicts it.  This was the ruling in Thorburn -v- Sunderland, also known as the metric martyrs case.

The right to trial by jury

Magna Carta gives the right to a trial by jury of your peers.  As with the Bill of Rights, Magna Carta is a constitutional law and cannot be repealed by implication.  The abolition of jury trials – first with the establishment of the county court system in the late 1800’s and more recently with the removal of the right to trial by jury for complex fraud cases – is unconstitutional and illegal.

Technorati Technorati Tags: , ,

Press Release: Birmingham, Coventry and Black Country City Region

The following press release has been sent out today:

Four anti-regionalisation campaigners have dealt a blow to regionalists in the area, undermining local authority plans to register the Birmingham, Coventry and Black Country City Region as a limited company by registering the company themselves.

Stuart Parr and Andrew Bridgwater of the West Midlands NO! Campaign have joined with John Franklyn of Telford Council Watch and veteran campaigner, David Barnett, to set up the company after hearing of plans to turn the city region into a limited company.

The group plan to use the company to support grass-roots democracy in the West Midlands.

Stuart Parr, founder of the West Midlands NO! Campaign said “Our leaders agreed to create this city region in secret and are refusing to consult the electorate. In return we have registered Birmingham, Coventry and Black Country City Region without consulting them”.

Andrew Bridgwater, a West Midlands NO! campaigner, said “The city region isn’t interested in people like you and me, their main concern is big business and what they want for the region. The city region is an affront to democracy”.

John Franklyn, co-founder of Telford Council Watch and Telford First, said “We’re playing them at their own game. At the ‘consultation’ on the Region Spatial Strategy and Regional Economic Strategy, Telford wasn’t even on the map and it’s not even part of the name of the city region”.

Dave Barnett said “Only the North East was asked if they wanted regional government and 78% of them said no. We, in the West Midlands, have never been asked”.

Anyone wishing to become involved with Birmingham, Coventry and Black Country City Region should contact either Telford Council Watch or West Midlands NO! on 08703004371 or 07973296118.

West Midlands NO! Campaign: http://www.westmidlandsno.org.uk/
Telford Council Watch: http://www.telfordcouncilwatch.org.uk/

Technorati Technorati Tags: ,

Eurorealist December 2007

The November 2007 edition of the Eurorealist Newsletter can be downloaded from here:

Technorati Technorati Tags: