Stuart Wheeler loses court case

! This post hasn't been updated in over a year. A lot can change in a year including my opinion and the amount of naughty words I use. There's a good chance that there's something in what's written below that someone will find objectionable. That's fine, if I tried to please everybody all of the time then I'd be a Lib Dem (remember them?) and I'm certainly not one of those. The point is, I'm not the kind of person to try and alter history in case I said something in the past that someone can use against me in the future but just remember that the person I was then isn't the person I am now nor the person I'll be in a year's time.

Stuart Wheeler has lost his court case to stop the ratification of the EU not-a-constitution.

Sadly (but not surprisingly) the judge ruled that the British govenment was perfectly entitled to lie in its manifesto and that the contract it makes with the electorate in the run-up to an election isn’t worth the paper it’s written on.

The result was expected but there was always that little glimmer of hope that the judge would rule that it is wrong for te British government to lie, that changing the way the EU constitution implements its changes and giving it a new name doesn’t make it a different thing entirely, that they were acting unlawfully when they debated and voted on a bill that was sub-judice and that Gordon Brown showed such contempt in attempting to ratify the EU not-a-constitution before he’d made his judgement that he needed bringing down a peg or two.

Sadly, this is not the case and the judiciary have once again failed to protect us from the treasonous politicians that pass for a government.

Technorati Technorati Tags: , ,

4 comments

  1. Andi (82 comments) says:

    That’s probably because certain members of the judiciary are in line for a peerage.

    Not that Liebour gives out peerages in return for cash or favours of course. Just wild speculation on my part.

  2. wonkotsane (1133 comments) says:

    No, they were found completely innocent of doing things like that. Sorry, my mistake – they were guilty, they just got away with it.

  3. Axel (1214 comments) says:

    was the judge, previously, not a knobbed up english lawyer( as opoposed to knobbed Scottish Advocate) on retainer from FCO?, it said that on the BBC, i thought it a little shady that he was allowed to pass judgement on his former bosses/employers who will soon be drop kicking him into the lords.

  4. Paul (13 comments) says:

    Sorry mate, we all knew this would happen, after all they are still going ahead with it regardless of Ireland’s vote. We only have one choice and that’s to go elsewhere. Otherwise we have to lump it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.