The corrupt media bought into the left wing lie that the BNP are a far right party but many bloggers know the truth – that the BNP are a far left party, more akin to Liebour than the parties on the right – and try our best to make sure as many people as possible get to know the truth.
The left’s propaganda is further discredited by Harriet Harperson’s admission that Liebour is scared of the BNP. Harperson says that the BNP “are a bigger threat than they have been before” and are so scared of losing votes to the far left BNP that they’re using a different election slogan in areas where BNP have a lot of support, are working with (ironically) with anti-fascist groups and even have anti-BNP battlebuses.
You will note that there are no such concerns from the right of centre Conswervatives or UKIP, nor is there a sustained campaign against the BNP from any party other than Liebour. Now that support for Liebour has collapsed, the left will be casting their protest votes for the BNP.
Yes, you want to wind up a Labour activist remind him that the BNP calls itself “Your father’s Labour Party.” The BNP are socialist to the core and are only “far-right” of the extremist left not on the proper political spectrum. British National Socialist Workers Party is their more accurate name. B-NAZIS for short.
Whilst the BNP are left wing they are far removed from the traditional labour views, but there again so are the current labour party 😉
…a good british tradittion i miss is 633 squadron on the box on Easter monday.
Did you know they used real planes?
Did you know that the reason they only made 2 films was because they had used all the spare planes in the firsy 2?
What does left wing mean?
What does right wing mean?
was it not originally something to do with the french parliment or government, if you were a socialist or whatever your office was in the left wing of the building and if you were a fascist or what ever your pffice was in the right wing?
“The BNP are socialist to the core and are only “far-right” of the extremist left not on the proper political spectrum”
So how come UKIP and the BNP seem to swap members so much?
http://www.richardcorbett.org.uk/blog/2008/11/why-ukip-is-just-not-credible-in.html
And how comes there are so many links between the two?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1544527/Revealed-Ukip-official-gave-money-to-the-BNP.html
http://bnp.org.uk/2007/12/bnp-gives-platform-to-a-ukip-member/
http://iaindale.blogspot.com/2006/07/ukip-bnp-in-pact-of-mutual-destruction.html
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/rumours-plotting-even-a-bnp-link–is-the-party-over-for-ukip-920824.html
The BNP are a threat to UKIP and to try to portray them as left-wing not only lacks credibility but also sounds like you are trying too hard to convice yourselves. It’s well documented that Nick Griffin thinks that UKIP is going to split and wants to loot the membership
It seems to me that you are playing the BNP game – the more you mention them, the more publicity they get and it makes you look afraid of them.
My advice would be to make sure you have a united front and then publicise your policies so that you don’t look like the one-policy anti-europe party that people see you as.
It’s taken a week for my post (above) to appear, is that a record : )?
I think it might be all the links, more than one link in a post does things.