! This post hasn't been updated in over a year. A lot can change in a year including my opinion and the amount of naughty words I use. There's a good chance that there's something in what's written below that someone will find objectionable. That's fine, if I tried to please everybody all of the time then I'd be a Lib Dem (remember them?) and I'm certainly not one of those. The point is, I'm not the kind of person to try and alter history in case I said something in the past that someone can use against me in the future but just remember that the person I was then isn't the person I am now nor the person I'll be in a year's time.
Benezir Bhutto has been injured by a suicide bomber who targetted her entourage as she left a rally near Islamabad.
She is said to be in a serious condition in hospital.
It was bound to happen at some point because she has so many enemies – both in the jihadi’s that live in the north of the country and in the Pakistani government, particularly President Musharraf who she has openly opposed. So who did it? “Al’Qaeda” will probably claim responsibility because any number of groups of jihadi’s seem to claim to be part of Al’Qaeda but my money is on Musharraf being behind it.
Update:
Bhutto is dead. This could mean trouble …
There’s no apostrophe in the plural of jihadi. I’d say it’s a safe bet that this has been “allowed” to happen by the security forces – Musharaf is the one who gains the most from this atrocity.
Is the plural of ‘Jihadi’ not ‘Jihadim’?
Not being a smart arse or nowt but if you get to pick on wonko, surely that means i get to pick on you?
Sure, I didn’t know that axel…
You are correct – ‘it was bound to happen’, which does not reflect well on Bhutto – http://www.charlesletterman.com/2007/12/suicide-is-gainless.html