Archive for Health

Another Patientline scam

Patientline, the rip-off provider of over-priced TV and phone services in hospitals, has a new scam – charging for headphones.

TVs have been taken off wards, the old piped radio system has been turned off and payphones have been taken away forcing patients to pay stupid amounts of money to watch TV, listen to the radio or use the phone.

Patientline charges £2.90 per day to watch TV and listen to the radio, they charge 26p per minute to make a phone call and friends and relatives calling in to a patient get charged 49p per minute.  Now they plan to charge £1 to buy a set of headphones to listen to the TV or radio.

BBC confusing England and Britain again

The BBC are confusing England and Britain again.  In this story about the poor availability of cancer drugs they keep referring to the UK when they actually mean England.

England doesn’t have access to the best cancer drugs because they’re so expensive.  They are, however, quite often available in the rest of the UK at the expense of the English taxpayer.  In this news report, however, the BBC makes no distinction between the different treatment and the way the NHS is run in the different home nations.

For instance, they say “In the NHS, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has responsibility for recommending if new drug treatments should be provided by the health service.”  This only applies to England – in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland they have control of their own NHS and regularly prescribe drugs that NICE hasn’t licensed or has refused to provide in England.

The BBC’s neglect in reporting the true scope of the problem – ie. it is England that has the problem, our neighbours get much better access to cancer drugs – is compounding the problem because it masks the true extent of medical apartheid from the public both in England and abroad.  The British government should be exposed for the anti-English, racist establishment it is.

Shropshire man given cancer treatment for free

A Shropshire pensioner who has been paying £3,000 per month for life saving cancer treatment that is free of charge on the NHS in Scotland will now receive his treatment free of charge from his Primary Care Trust (PCT).

John Green from Bridgnorth has been paying for Sorafenib Nexaval out of his own pocket because the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (National = England, of course, not the UK) hasn’t approved the drug meaning that PCTs in England don’t have to provide the drug when it’s needed.  In Scotland, the drug is available on free on the NHS because the Scottish government has an £11.3bn subsidy from the English taxpayer to spend on whatever they want.

Bloody junkies taking the piss

I’m sure I’ve ranted before about junkies getting preferential treatment in chemists when they’re going for their methedone – the pharmacists drop everything, actually stop serving people, to give them their medication.

Today I’ve seen the best one of all – so good, in fact, that I couldn’t help saying something.

Two young lads walked in, laughing and shouting and asked for some needles.  A pharmacist stopped what she was doing and went and got a pack of needles and put them in a bag and gave them to the lads.  They didn’t pay, they didn’t need a prescription, nothing.  They do drugs and instead of being punished for illegally possessing and taking drugs, they are actually helped free of charge on the NHS!

It’s amazing, isn’t it, that while cancer patients are being refused life saving cancer treatments and asthmatics have to pay for their life saving inhalers, that junkies get methedone and needles for free on the NHS.

Shropshire man denied life saving cancer drug on NHS

A Shropshire man – John Green of Bridgnorth, Shropshire – has been refused the kidney cancer drug Sorafenib Nexaval on the NHS.

The drug is freely available in Scotland thanks to the £11.3bn of English taxes given to Scotland under the discredited Barnett Formula by Chancellor Gordon Brown.

Mr Green is currently funding the £3,000 per month treatment out of his own pocket but can’t continue for much longer as he is living off a pension.

Ethnic Monitoring in hospitals

The Healthcare Commission is calling for hospitals to monitor the ethnicity of patients because their research has shown that black and asians are more likely to be admitted to a mental hospital.

There doesn’t appear to be any suggestion that this is because of institutional racism or that black and asian patients are being targetted unfairly so I’m at a loss as to why the Healthcare Commission feels it necessary to monitor patients’ ethnicity.  Surely the only criteria that matter in assessing a patient for mental health care is whether they have mental problems, not what colour their skin is?

Another life saving drug we can’t have

The Times says that there are at least 8 other life saving drugs that are refused in England but provided on the NHS in Scotland.

This is probably part of the mysterious “union dividend” that Gordon Brown keeps talking about.  Where else in the world could 85% of the population be denied life saving cancer treatments whilst still be expected to pay for the same life saving treatments for the other 15%?  Nazi Germany?  Apartheid-era South Africa?

The Commission for Racial Equality are obviously too busy to take this racist government to task over things like medical apartheid.

A prescription for disaster

From the 1st of April the price of a prescription in England is to rise by 20p to £6.85 per item.

Most terminally ill patients, cancer sufferers and disabled people still have to pay for their prescriptions, as do asthma sufferers.  The whole idea of charging people for life-saving medication is just wrong but what is even more wrong is the fact that in Wales prescriptions are free and in Scotland about 85% of prescriptions are exempt from charges and the Scottish government has plans to abolish prescription charges north of the border.

The price rise comes into force on April Fools Day – how ironic.  The irony is that we must be fools to continue to accept such blatant discrimination.  Most prescriptions in Scotland are free, all prescriptions in Wales are free and who pays for it?  The English taxpayer through the Barnett Formula which forces England to subsidise the rest of the UK.

Man considers moving for cancer treatment

A man living in England is considering moving to North Britain so that he can get a cancer treatment that he is not allowed in England.

The man, who is in remission from a rare terminal bone cancer, wants to be prescribed Velcade when his cancer comes back but the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) won’t allow it to be prescribed in England.

The drug is available free of charge in North Britain where the health system is subsidised extensively by the English taxpayer.

Unfortunately for the man involved, you have to live in North Britain for 3 years before you qualify for the special medical treatment that your taxes are paying for.

Hat-tip: Blog of Kev

Muslim Health Service

A “muslim expert” has called for the NHS to provide a faith-based service.

He calls on the cash-strapped National Health Service to provide better access to prayer facilities, more information on alcohol-based treatments, circumcision of children and guaranteed same-sex medical staff.

The NHS is already short of cash and this is an unncessary and unreasonable demand to make of it.  There are plenty of private muslim doctors if it is that much of an issue but there is no reason whatsoever why we should have to provide a special Islamified health service in a non-muslim country.

Smoking Age to rise to 18

The minimum age for buying cigarettes and tobacco products is to rise to 18 from October this year.

The new age limit will only apply to England and Wales and will bring England and Wales into line with the US, Canada, New Zealand and Australia who also have a minimum age of 18.

Increasing the minimum legal age for smoking is a good idea, as is the smoking ban.  However, what is really needed is a full smoking ban.  Bugger the arguments about the amount of taxes coming from the sale of tobacco products and how the NHS would fall apart without them – smokers are a drain on the NHS and to be perfectly honest, I don’t trust the pro-smoking pressure groups’ assertions to the contrary and more than I believe the unionist argument that England will be devastated by the loss of north sea oil and gas when Scotland declares independence.

As a full smoking ban is unlikely to take place, how about putting a vegetable dye in cigarettes so the smoke they produce comes out brown?  That would have two positive effects – firstly, it would stop fags from being seen as “cool” by kids and secondly, it would easily identify people smoking foreign fags (most of which will have been smuggled into the country) because they won’t be producing dirty brown smoke.

GP Home Visit on Christmas Day?

Source: BBC News

John Prescott, feeling unwell on Christmas Day, was visited by a doctor at his home, admitted to hospital, diagnosed with a kidney stone and discharged in the afternoon.

Getting a home visit from your GP is virtually impossible at the best of times, let alone on Christmas Day.  As for being admitted to hospital and diagnosed on Christmas Day in a few hours is similarly almost unheard of.

Could it be that our great socialist deputy prime minister had preferential treatment?  Can everyone expect the same treatment on the NHS?

Shropshire Star: EU not to blame for NHS woes

EU not to blame for NHS woes

According to certain readers the EU is to blame for the failures in the NHS.Stuart Parr (Starmail, November 20) claims it has issued a directive removing the individual opt-out from the Working Time Directive, hereby forcing hospitals to cut services.

This is not true. The EU cannot just issue a directive and “dictate” it is observed. It can only propose directives for agreement. There is no such agreement on revision to the Working Time Directive, and the individual opt-out therefore remains in place.

R Knight (November 17) says the merger of the PRH and RSH is because the EU has insisted such services are regionalised. This is further nonsense. The EU has no such powers, and no such purpose.

Philip Bushill-Matthews MEP

Firstly, I was told by the person who wrote the proposals for the cuts to paediatric services at the PRH that they had to downgrade the service because the EU had removed the opt-out clause for medical staff in the Working Time Directives. Who would you believe? A eurofederalist MEP or a manager at the hospital?

Secondly, the EU dictates many laws and the British government is unable to veto a large number of them. In fact, the day this appeared in the Shropshire Star (Wednesday) I received an email regarding the EU removing the derogation on British pleasure boats using red diesel from January 2007. The British government cannot veto this decision. The British government is currently trying to convince the EU that forcing British motorists to use their lights at all times will endanger more motorcyclists than it saves motorists and is therefore a bad idea. They have to convince the EU now because they are unable to veto the directive.

Thirdly, the EU issues all funding through regional structures.  It also dictates that regional government must be put in place in all member states.  The regionalisation of the NHS is simply an extension of the general regionalisation forced on us by the EU.

Aren’t the Tories supposed to be eurosceptic?

No2ID Take on the NHS database

A No2ID press release today brings our attention to The Big Opt Out – a campaign against the national NHS database and the mass upload of patients details to the database without patients permission.

The Department of Health has instructed GP’s to upload patient details they hold – personal details, medical history, records of GP visits, etc – to the new database when it comes online without first obtaining the permission of the patients.  Sensitive information such as terminations or mental problems are supposed to be able to be locked away in the database but that system isn’t being implemented straight away meaning all these details will be available to over a million NHS workers – including temporary workers and secretaries – and will be maintained by a private company based in Warwick.

All is not lost, however.  You can instruct your GP not to upload these details using this form.

I want a tax rebate

My local authority, Telford & Wrekin Council, has taken it upon themselves to offer to borrow £20m from the British government to help bail out our local hospital.

The loan would be paid through increases in our council tax bills but the people of Telford & Wrekin haven’t even been consulted – the decision has been made (without even talking to the hospital, I might add) and announced in the local press.  This is exactly how the decision was made to subsume Telford into the Birmingham, Black Country and Coventry City Region and to hand over much of the council’s executive functions to a private company jointly owned by the council, Advantage West Midlands and local businesses.

I already pay for the hospital through my national insurance contributions and income tax, why should I pay again throught my council tax?

If they go ahead with this plan then I will formally request a tax rebate from the Treasury.

Another cancer drug we can’t have

It’s looking increasingly likely that the lung cancer drug Tarceva will not be made available in England.

The drug is widely available in North Britain but NICE considers the drugs not to be an effective use of taxpayers money.  Money isn’t such an issue for our neighbours north of the border as it is the multi-billion pound subsidy paid by English taxpayers that means they can afford expensive medical treatments.

Hospital staff face parking fees

Hospital staff at the debt-ridden Shrewsbury & Telford hospitals might end up paying up to £120 per year for the privelege of parking at work.

The hospitals are struggling to clear a mountain of debt, hindered by the unwillingness of the Welsh government to pay the going rate for treating Welsh patients, the underfunding of the English NHS to pay for the overfunding of the NHS in the rest of the UK and the instruction from the Minister for Health to pay a few million into a regional NHS bank.

Charging hospital staff to park at work is one of the ideas put forward to help pay the debts, along with cuts to services throughout the county.

Still, as long as Scottish cancer patients can get their expensive drugs it’s worth it isn’t it?

Holby City – BBC misses opportunity to expose EU

Whilst sitting on the sofa in agony last night (I’ll explain later) I watched Holby City with Mrs Sane.

Part of the plot was an … unconventional … doctor who decided to help out a patient who had sold her kidney on the black market to pay for AIDS medication for her brother in Ghana.  Twice during the programme he got into a heated discussion with a pharmacist and another doctor about why their returned drugs were destroyed instead of given away to Africa.  “Go on say it” I screamed to myself.  “Tell the viewers why perfectly good drugs are thrown away instead of being donated to needy people”.

“It’s illegal” shouted one of the doctors.  No, the moment has gone and the BBC has missed yet

another opportunity to expose the European Federation and the stupid laws that it is flooding our statute books with.  The NHS used to send returned drugs to Africa but the European Federation banned it.

Daily Mail: Medical apartheid

Front page on todays Dail Mail:

Medical apartheid as English cancer patients are denied life-extending drug

Terminal cancer patients accused Health Secretary of condemning them to death because they are English after the NHS drug rationing body refused to fund a new wonder drug that is available in Scotland.

Patricia Hewitt came under fire from three women with bone cancer after the National Institute for Clinical Excellence rejected calls to supply English patients with the drug Velcade.

The treatment, which can extend the lives of sufferers by up to seven years, was approved for patients in Scotland in October 2004 and is routinely available in the rest of Europe.

The leaked ruling, seen by the Daily Mail, which was not due to be made public until next week, reveals that the drug is more clinically effective than chemotherapy but is not regarded as ‘cost effective’.

Velcade is just the latest drug to be rejected in England when it is available in Scotland. Implants for newly diagnosed high grade gliomas – a fast growing form of brain tumour – got the go ahead in Scotland last December, but NICE blocked them in April this year.

The drug Alimta that extends the lives of people with mesothelioma, a cancer of the lining of the lungs, was approved in Scotland in August 2005 and was also rejected by NICE in April.

Cancer charities claimed the latest ruling is clear evidence that NICE is refusing to fund treatments that extend the lives of cancer sufferers and give them valuable time with their families and buy them time while a cure is found.

Since June, the drugs watchdog has refused to endorse five treatments that would extend the lives of people with bowel cancer, leukemia, breast cancer and Alzheimer’s disease.

All of them were cheaper than the breast cancer cure Herceptin, which Miss Hewitt intervened to promote earlier this year.

The Velcade ruling is just the latest in a succession of decisions where drugs approved for use in Scotland have been rejected as too expensive for English patients.

Janice Wrigglesworth, 59, from Keighley in West Yorkshire, who has multiple myeloma – cancer of the bones and bone marrow – condemned the decision.

She said: ‘It’s absolute insanity that Velcade is available in Scotland but not England. Are they saying a Scottish life is worth more than an English life?’

‘They are effectively saying to people with incurable diseases: sit down in a darkened room and die.’

Fellow sufferer, midwife Jacky Pickles condemned Miss Hewitt for failing to intervene. She said that after 25 years working in the NHS she will have to give the final years of her life to a Health Service that refuses to save her.

Jacky, 44, whose condition improved when she went on a Velcade drug trial earlier this year, has now been told that she will not get the drug again when her condition deteriorates.

She said: ‘I am absolutely devastated by Nice’s decision. I believe that Patricia Hewitt has, through the back door of NICE, encouraged a new policy that saves the NHS money by condemning patients to an early death which means they are less of a financial burden both in the short term and the long term.

‘If treatment simply improves a patient’s quality of life and extends that life three or five years she is not interested. But those years mean everything to cancer patients and their families. Refusing the drug is not tough, it is heartless. It denies us the right to life.’

‘I am going back to work at Bradford Royal Infirmary for 12 hours a week in December. I am doing two six hours shifts because that is all I can possibly do physically. I am going to give them the last years of my life. I’ve got to go and work in a Health Service that won’t support me when I most need it. I have given my life to the NHS but it is a system that won’t give me something I need to save my life.’

The two women, and their friend Marie Morton confronted Miss Hewitt about their plight at the Labour Party conference last month and handed her a letter urging her to intervene. Last night they announced that they are raising funds to launch legal action to win access to the drug.

Marie, 57, added: ‘Patricia Hewitt said she would get back to us when we met her but she has not had the decency to reply to our letter. She just doesn’t care because it doesn’t affect her.’ The Velcade Three, as the women call themselves, have now set up a website (www.velcadethree.co.uk) to raise funds for their legal campaign.

Unless NICE approves a drug, hospitals are not compelled to supply it on the NHS. It is up to individual trusts to decide whether they can afford it.

Velcade costs between £9,000 and £18,000 for a course of treatment, compared with more than £25,000 for Herceptin.

Every year around 4,000 patients are diagnosed with myeloma.

A spokeswoman for Myeloma UK said: ‘If this is true the decision represents the single biggest setback in the history of the treatment of myeloma. There are 20,000 people with myeloma in the UK and this will affect every single person at one time or another. Eight people die of myeloma every day.’

NICE covers England but has proved slower in making decisions than its sister organisations the Scottish Medicines Consortium and the All Wales Medicines Strategy Group.

Shadow Health Secretary Andrew Lansley said: ‘I had a constituent who fought to get Velcade and he is doing well. Either we have a National Health Service or we don’t. In fact it has become a Scottish and a separate English Health Service.’

LibDem spokesman Steve Webb said: ‘There cannot be any difference in the clinical effect of the drug North and South of the border and it simply cannot be any different in terms of cost effectiveness. If we place value on an extra few years with families NIce should be asked to do more to take that into account.’

Cancer charities are also concerned that NICE does not put the right value on extending human life.

Avastin and Erbitux, which prolongs life for those with Colorectal Cancer, and Gemzar, which extends life for those with advanced breast cancer have been turned down by NICE because they do not buy enough time for patients – along with four drugs which can slow the onset of dementia and Fludarabine, a drug which extends the lives of patients with leukemia.

Derryn Borley, Cancerbackup Head of Cancer Support Services, said: ‘Until this year, only one in eight cancer treatments have been turned down by NICE, but since the beginning of 2006 this has dramatically risen to one in two.

‘Many of the treatments being rejected are life-extending treatments. These treatments do not cure but they can give valuable extra time to spend with family and friends which is very important to cancer patients. ‘

Ian Beaumont, a spokesman for Bowel Cancer UK, said: ‘It’s wrong that people are playing God. Life is too precious for people to put a price on it like this.

‘Who is to say that living for another six months or a year or more is not worth it? You are talking about giving someone more time with their children, their family, another Christmas.

‘The UK has been at the forefront of developing these new treatments but we’re at the back of the queue when it comes to giving them to patients. People are left to sell their house or car to try and pay for the drugs themselves. People who should be fighting the disease are left fighting bureaucracy.’

A NICE spokeswoman said: ‘NICE’s expert advisors review all of the evidence on cancer treatments to determine whether they add benefits for patients when compared to other treatments that are already available.

‘The benefits that we assess include whether a drug extends life, and whether a drug improves patients’ quality of life.’

A Department of Health spokeswoman said they could not comment until the guidance is published. But she claimed that the Scottish and Welsh drug monitoring bodies ‘do not cover the area to the same depth or level of transparency and when final NICE guidance is issued it will be used in Wales.’

She claimed that the concerns of the Velcade Three ‘are taken seriously’ by Miss Hewitt ‘and they will receive a response very soon.’

When will the people of England wake up and smell the roses?  We are worthless in the eyes of the Scottish Raj, nothing more than unwilling donors to the Labour Party election fund.  Thanks to the British government’s lopsided devolution botch, 85% of the population – 50m English people – are expected to just give up and die because there is no money left to pay for medical treatment after the English taxpayer has finished subsidising the rest of the UK.

Apartheid?  Conspiracy to murder more like.  Voters of England, remember this next time you go to the ballot box.

NICE drugs if you can get them

Three women confronted Patricia Hewitt on Wednesday at a Labour Stazi conference fringe meeting over the cancer drug Velcade being refused to English cancer sufferers.

The three women from Yorkshire are suffering from multiple myeloma, a rare bone marrow cancer, but are unable to have the only licenced treatment – Velcade – because it is not approved by NICE.  The drug is, however, available to in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland where their own national governments approve more expensive drugs because the English taxpayer is footing the bill.

When confronted over this, Hewitt said that Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland make their own decisions but we have NICE.  She went on to say that NICE is excellent and being copied all over the world.

I wonder if these three women dying from a treatable form of cancer think that NICE is good.  How about the women dying because they can’t have Herceptin or the people dying because they can’t have some bowel cancer drugs?  These people would all get life saving treatment if they didn’t live in England but because they are English they are left to die.